Discussion:
[9fans] Linking error with 8l, guys, could you tell
(too old to reply)
l***@proxima.alt.za
2012-11-28 11:51:51 UTC
Permalink
int num = 20;
int num = 30;
Looks easy to fix, but I understand where you're coming from. What
stops you from using a workaround?

++L
Bence Fábián
2012-11-28 12:12:50 UTC
Permalink
DATA opnames<1>+116(SB)/4,$string<1>+739(SB)
and
DATA etnames<1)+72(SB)/4,$string<1>+912(SB)

are the second initializations of both opnames and etnames.
you can grep for them in the output of
8c -S source.c

that's all i can help, cause i can't tell what $string<1>+739(SB)
and $string<1>+912(SB) refer to
since they are adresses.
Post by l***@proxima.alt.za
int num = 20;
int num = 30;
Looks easy to fix, but I understand where you're coming from. What
stops you from using a workaround?
++L
Bence Fábián
2012-11-28 12:22:30 UTC
Permalink
but what is _most_ likely is that you really have them initialized two
times.
just do
g '(op|et)names ?='
you should find 4 initializations. just delete the redundant ones.
Post by Bence Fábián
DATA opnames<1>+116(SB)/4,$string<1>+739(SB)
and
DATA etnames<1)+72(SB)/4,$string<1>+912(SB)
are the second initializations of both opnames and etnames.
you can grep for them in the output of
8c -S source.c
that's all i can help, cause i can't tell what $string<1>+739(SB)
and $string<1>+912(SB) refer to
since they are adresses.
Loading...